Reading: Rod Dreher case: Päivi Räsänen says censorship would be the worst outcome

Rod Dreher case: Päivi Räsänen says censorship would be the worst outcome

Published
2 min read
Advertisement

Päivi Räsänen said the worst outcome of her criminal trial would not be a fine or even prison, but censorship. The Finnish MP, who once served as Minister of the Interior, spoke just days before she is due in The Helsinki District Court on 24 January over three criminal charges tied to a pamphlet, a radio debate and a tweet with Bible verses.

Her remarks land now because the case is moving from investigation to court. For Räsänen, that makes the stakes immediate: she says the dispute is about freedom of speech and religion, while Finland's Prosecutor General has pressed ahead with charges over public statements she says reflected her Christian beliefs. Bishop Juhana Pohjola is to stand trial alongside her.

Räsänen has spent the past two years under pressure from a case that began with police investigations in June 2019. She said she has sat through several lengthy police interrogations about her Christian beliefs, and she linked the scrutiny to her questioning of her church's sponsorship of Pride 2019. The criminal file reaches back further still, to a pamphlet she wrote in 2004 on marriage and sexual ethics, then to a radio debate in 2019 and a later tweet sent to church leadership that included Bible verses.

- Advertisement -

That is the friction at the center of the case. Two of the three charges were brought after police made strong recommendations not to continue the prosecution, yet the case moved forward anyway. Räsänen has said her statements did not violate Twitter rules or the policies of the national broadcaster, and they remain publicly available on those platforms. She also says she will keep speaking and writing because the issue is conviction, not opinion.

What happens on 24 January will decide more than a courtroom argument over one tweet. The Helsinki District Court will hear whether speech rooted in religion and objections to Pride 2019 can be treated as criminal conduct, or whether the case collapses into a ruling that leaves Räsänen's posts untouched and her claim of censorship vindicated.

Advertisement
Share This Article