Reading: Dave Ramsey tells Donna panic-selling cost her $26,000 and years of gains

Dave Ramsey tells Donna panic-selling cost her $26,000 and years of gains

Published
3 min read
Advertisement

told on his radio show that the 71-year-old’s decision to pull retirement money out during COVID locked in a loss she never had to take and may have cost her a far larger nest egg. Donna said she and her husband rushed out of the market after their accounts fell about $26,000 in a week, then got back in and pulled the money out again.

The exchange is drawing attention because the warning lands right when many older savers still worry about market swings and whether they have time to ride them out. Ramsey’s message was blunt: if the money had stayed invested, the account could have grown from $200,000 to $400,000, a difference that is hard to absorb when retirement income is on the line.

Donna told Ramsey that during COVID she watched the stock market dive and felt the drop in her 401(k)s and retirement accounts almost immediately. “So we took it out real quick,” she said, adding that she and her husband believed they did not have time to recover. Ramsey’s response was just as direct. “Your $200 would be $400 if you’d have left it alone,” he told her, using the rounded figures he said illustrated the lost upside.

- Advertisement -

pushed the point further by saying the first drop had already been erased in about 50 days. “The problem is the first dive when you said you lost the $26,000, it recovered in like 50 days. The moment you took it out, you just locked in that loss. You 100% lost the $26,000,” she said. That detail is the sharpest part of Donna’s story: the money was gone only because it was removed before the rebound had time to do its work.

Ramsey said Donna missed three straight years of 25% gains after getting out, a stretch he used to argue that panic can do more damage than a bad allocation. He also told her she did not need to be investing in the stock market if she did not have “the backbone to stand the volatility,” then advised her to move the money to a high-yield savings account instead. For him, the lesson was simple: a less-than-perfect portfolio that stays invested beats an ideal one sold at the bottom.

He backed that view with a broader market argument, saying 97% of five-year stock market periods are profitable. He also pointed to the 2008 financial crisis, when the fell from 13,000 to 6,500 before climbing to 36,000 in the years that followed. The numbers were meant to show that downturns can feel final while they are happening, even when history says otherwise.

What remains unclear is whether Donna and her 84-year-old husband actually moved into the high-yield savings account Ramsey recommended, or what they are holding now. But the larger point is already fixed by her own account: the real loss was not the week the market fell. It was the decision to leave before the recovery started.

Advertisement
Share This Article