Peter Hitchens has drawn a sharp rebuke after accusing London families on cargo bikes of riding illegal electric motorcycles. The exchange began on June 1, 2026, when Will Norman posted a photo showing five family bikes gathered at a single junction during the morning school run.
Norman, London’s cycling and walking commissioner, said the image was meant to show a normal part of the city’s school run, not a stunt. He pointed out that more than 250,000 cars still do the morning school run in London, and argued that bike lanes and school streets were giving families more choice about how to travel.
That was enough to trigger the row. Hitchens responded by saying the cargo bike families were not on bikes at all, but on “very heavy electric motorcycles, mysteriously exempt from licensing, registration, driving tests, and insurance.” He also argued that the basic rule of British road safety, in place since 1934, had been quietly abandoned and asked where the records were for the change.
Norman pushed back quickly. He said the bikes in the photo were “fully compliant e-bikes” that had to be pedalled and were capped at 15.5mph. He added that he shared concerns about illegal e-bikes that are closer to electric motorcycles, including machines that do not need pedalling and are not speed-limited, and said he had raised the issue with government.
That distinction matters because the argument is not really about cargo bikes on a London street. It is about where legal electrically assisted pedal cycles end and illegal high-powered e-motorbikes begin, a line that affects policing, road safety and how the public understands what can and cannot be ridden on Britain’s roads.
The dispute also exposed an awkward split. Hitchens framed the photo as proof that rules had been relaxed too far, while Norman used it to defend families who are using legal e-cargo bikes to replace car trips. Dr Robert Davis, chair of the Road Danger Reduction Forum, entered the exchange too, telling Hitchens: “I’m sad that you’ve gone down this road.”
For now, the photograph remains what it was on June 1: a snapshot of families on the school run that has turned into a wider argument about regulation. Norman has already said he has raised illegal e-bikes with the government, but the question left hanging is whether that push produces any new enforcement before the next round of claims about what is, and is not, a bike.
