Reading: Sunshine Protection Act passes House as Senate resistance builds

Sunshine Protection Act passes House as Senate resistance builds

Published
2 min read
Advertisement

The House passed the Sunshine Protection Act last week, moving the push to make Daylight Saving Time permanent into the Senate, where it faces a much rougher path. The bill would let states observe Daylight Saving Time year-round and end the twice-yearly change of clocks.

That is why the measure is drawing fresh attention now. President Donald Trump wants Congress to approve permanent Daylight Saving Time, and the House vote put that idea back on the calendar just as the Senate becomes the place that will decide whether it goes anywhere.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said there are passionate views on both sides of the issue and that some senators are willing to really slow things down over it. “So we'll see,” he said, adding that the House acting first does not guarantee the Senate will move. The question is not just whether the bill has support, but whether it has enough support to overcome the people ready to stall it.

- Advertisement -

That resistance matters because Tom Cotton said last year that he would “always oppose” efforts for permanent Daylight Saving. His position lands especially hard because Trump wants the change, yet one of his allies is already drawing a line against it. The split is a reminder that this fight does not break neatly along party lines.

The broader debate has been around before. Congress enacted year-round Daylight Saving Time in the 1970s, then repealed it about a year later after some parents objected to children having to wait in the dark for the school bus. No states observe permanent Daylight Saving Time by their own laws, and Hawaii and Arizona remain the only two states that use permanent standard time.

That leaves the Senate as the decisive hurdle. If lawmakers there are willing to slow the bill down, the Sunshine Protection Act can fade without ever reaching a final vote. If they are not, the debate over whether Americans keep changing clocks twice a year moves one step closer to ending.

Advertisement
Share This Article