Reading: Judge pauses Live Nation breakup discovery as verdict fight continues

Judge pauses Live Nation breakup discovery as verdict fight continues

Published
3 min read
Advertisement

U.S. District Judge has put the brakes on breakup-related discovery in the antitrust case, pausing the next phase of the fight while the company tries to erase the monopoly verdict that state attorneys general won at trial.

The June 3 order means the states cannot yet begin building a record for possible structural remedies against Live Nation and , including a divestiture of Ticketmaster, sell-offs of Live Nation amphitheaters, limits on exclusive contracts or monetary relief. That matters now because discovery is where the states would try to assemble the facts they say could justify a breakup or other penalties, and the pause gives Live Nation a procedural win as it presses its appeal before the court even reaches remedies.

Live Nation filed post-verdict motions on May 21 asking for judgment as a matter of law on all claims or, failing that, a new trial. In that filing, the company said the jury got it wrong, the states got it wrong and the evidence was legally insufficient. It also argued that the market definitions were defective, the damages testimony should never have been admitted and the trial was tainted by prejudicial evidence and flawed jury instructions.

- Advertisement -

Subramanian sided with the company on timing, not on the merits. He wrote that “any discovery relating to remedies will be stayed pending the Court’s disposition of the post-trial motions,” and said he would “defer any decision on defendants’ two-stage discovery proposal until the pending post-trial motions are resolved.” If discovery is later allowed, he added, defendants may still raise objections, including to the sequencing of that discovery.

The states had pushed back in a May 27 letter, urging the court to reject Live Nation’s sequencing proposal and move ahead with remedies discovery. That fight matters because the remedies phase could determine whether the case stops at a monetary award or moves toward far more sweeping structural relief, the kind of outcome antitrust enforcers often seek when they say a dominant company has to be reshaped, not just fined.

The order leaves one piece of the case untouched: the verdict itself. For now, Live Nation and Ticketmaster have bought time, and the states have lost the chance to start laying out their breakup case. Whether that changes will depend first on whether Subramanian upholds the verdict and only then on whether the remedies phase opens at all.

Advertisement
Share This Article